CSHA Web Site - State Licensure
  Licensure Survey Key Points
   
Event Calendar
Consumer Information
Credentialing
Find a Clinician
CSHA Membership
Continuing Education
Careers in Speech and Hearing
Web Links
Member Area
CSHA Board

squiggle.gif (79 bytes) CSHA Licensure Committee

 

MISSION STATEMENT

The Colorado Speech-Language-Hearing Association has made a commitment to pursue the process of state licensure for Speech-Language Pathologists in Colorado.

View the Committee's January 22, 2010 Metro presentation HERE (PDF)

Read Michigan & Minnesota's Licensure Requirements HERE


Licensure Survey Results

CSHA members & non-members alike responded to our recent licensure survey.

Overwhelmingly, Speech-Language Pathologists expressed a strong desire (85%) for CSHA to pursue a state-wide licensure.

Survey Breakdown

(Total of 500 respondents)

85% of SLPs in Colorado favor licensure

  • 65% of school based respondents

  • 90% of healthcare based respondents

  • 95% of private practice respondents

13% are opposed to licensure

2% are undecided

80% of those in favor of licensure held licenses in other states

Key Points: Pursuing Licensure for Colorado SLPs

Consumer Protection…Colorado Currently a “Buyer Beware State”

  • Skills & training to meet treatment plan

  • Potential harm (FEES, MBS, NMES, loss of money & time)

  • Documented evidence-based practice or practice-based evidence required (outcomes)

  • State database of qualified professionals

Degree/Title/Scope of Practice Protection

  • Many of ethics violations presented to CSHA over the years have to do with concerns of individual calling themselves SLPs without holding a masters degree

  • Without a state licensure law to clearly define and protect our scope practice, we are vulnerable to other powerful organizations defining it for us

    • E.g. See 2010 AMA Draft Scope of Practice for Audiologists (stated drafts in works other allied health professions – such as: SLP, OT, PT, Psychologists)

Help with SLP Shortages

  • portability across settings (schools, clinics, medical facilities & private practice)

  • reciprocity with other states (allows easy movement between states)

Legal Recourse

  • Adds teeth to CDE guidelines

  • ASHA can censor within own membership but has no legal authority within states

SLPA, support personnel

  • protection for qualifications

  • supervision enforcement

Last state w/o licensure – magnet for those who cannot practice in other states;
(other states also have shortages; having licensure does not add to shortages problem, but may help)

Reimbursement from third party insurance is easier
(insurers require state licensure)

Standardizes continuing education requirements across settings



 

HOME PAGEa>  |  MEMBERSHIP   |  CONSUMER  |  CONTINUING EDUCATION  |  CAREERS
CONFERENCE  |  LINKS

squiggle.gif (79 bytes)

© Copyright 2009 Colorado Speech-Language-Hearing Assn.

E-Mail: cshassoc@aol.com